A much better Orbiter
- Thread starter NOPE
- Start date
Why doesnt the blueprint load?
Edit: here is the drive link to it
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FcDtmfepSU7M-o0WGY75j6j1V_WjG9hV/view?usp=drivesdk
Edit: here is the drive link to it
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FcDtmfepSU7M-o0WGY75j6j1V_WjG9hV/view?usp=drivesdk
T
Horus Lupercal, your opinion has been requested.
Horus Lupercal
Primarch - Warmaster
Professor
Swingin' on a Star
Deja Vu
Biker Mice from Mars
ET phone home
Floater
Copycat
Registered
Shuttles, I'd defer to TtTOtW. They're his speciality/passion.
However since I'm here, several questions / points.
1. I take it you're not using an ET/Booster? It's your choice whether you do or not, but I would consider using them for the reason that you can get further and swap the engines on the shuttle for smaller, more efficient ones and let the booster do the heavy lifting.
2. The batteries you have fitted in the nose and payload bay are surplus to requirements. You can get rid of them.
3. The fuel tanks in the 'tail', overlap them somehow with the main body fuel tanks and the engines will draw from them without having to do fuel transfer in flight.
Aside from that, it's not a bad punt at a shuttle dude.
However since I'm here, several questions / points.
1. I take it you're not using an ET/Booster? It's your choice whether you do or not, but I would consider using them for the reason that you can get further and swap the engines on the shuttle for smaller, more efficient ones and let the booster do the heavy lifting.
2. The batteries you have fitted in the nose and payload bay are surplus to requirements. You can get rid of them.
3. The fuel tanks in the 'tail', overlap them somehow with the main body fuel tanks and the engines will draw from them without having to do fuel transfer in flight.
Aside from that, it's not a bad punt at a shuttle dude.
