Advantages and disadvantages of SR2, Spaceflight Simulator and Kerbal space programm ....

#1
I like Ksp so much,
but my old Laptopßpp urghh.
summary
Clock speed 2.1 GHz Cores Dual core Socket type
  1. 479
  2. P


features
Has a NX bit Yes Supports trusted computing No Has virtualization support Yes Instruction set extensions
  1. MMX
  2. SSE
  3. SSE2
  4. SSE4.1
  5. SSE3
  6. Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes

power consumption
TDP 35W Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year Performance per watt 2.49 pt/W Typical power consumption 28.44W

bus
Architecture FSB Number of links 1 Clock speed 800 MHz
details
Architecture x86-64 Threads 2 threads L2 cache 3 MB L2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core Manufacture process 45 nm Transistor count 410,000,000 Max CPUs 1 Clock multiplier 10 Voltage range 1 - 1.25V

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.47 GHz Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.1 GHz Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None





data from http://cpuboss.com/cpu/Intel-Core2-Duo-T8100
 

Altaïr

Space Stig, Master of gravity
Staff member
Head Moderator
Team Kolibri
Modder
TEAM HAWK
Atlas
Deja Vu
Under Pressure
Forum Legend
#2
Is it me or... are you off-topic in your own thread? From the title I was expecting a discussion about pros/cons of KSP/SFS/SR2, not about your PC's specifications...
 

Gurren Lagann

«★» Officer «» //PT
Professor
ET phone home
Man on the Moon
Registered
#5
Maybe he's trying to ask how well his laptop would peform running either KSP, SFS, or SR2
 

Horus Lupercal

Primarch - Warmaster
Professor
Swingin' on a Star
Deja Vu
Biker Mice from Mars
ET phone home
Floater
Copycat
Registered
#7
Maybe he's trying to ask how well his laptop would peform running either KSP, SFS, or SR2
Yes, but it still belongs in this section, not the other one. Thanks Gurren. Horus Lupercal some advice?
Yep. And I'm no expert on computers but from these stats his laptop is more obsolete than my old one. I'd be surprised if he can play KSP at all on this on anything more than the most reduced settings. Depends on his graphics card.

Might get away with 1.35 PC though.
 
T

TtTOtW

Guest
#8
Yep. And I'm no expert on computers but from these stats his laptop is more obsolete than my old one. I'd be surprised if he can play KSP at all on this on anything more than the most reduced settings. Depends on his graphics card.

Might get away with 1.35 PC though.
Thanks Horus.
 
#12
Maybe this
i searched some Laptops with CPU and one of this
Dell Studio 1735 refurbished
Includes AC Adapter Operating System Windows 10 Manufacturer Dell Software Windows 10 Professional & Microsoft Office Home and Business 2010 Processor Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz Storage 250GB Optical DVD-RW RAM 4GB Grade B Display 17.2" Camera YES Form Factor Large-size Wireless Connectivity YE
i think he has normal n otebook
or he let us see his retro laptop
https://connectall.org/dell-studio-1735-core-2-duo-t8100-at-2-10ghz-4gb-ram-250gb-hdd.html
 

Gecko Gekkota

Former Empress of the AE
Forum Technician
#14
Maybe this
i searched some Laptops with CPU and one of this
Dell Studio 1735 refurbished
Includes AC Adapter Operating System Windows 10 Manufacturer Dell Software Windows 10 Professional & Microsoft Office Home and Business 2010 Processor Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz Storage 250GB Optical DVD-RW RAM 4GB Grade B Display 17.2" Camera YES Form Factor Large-size Wireless Connectivity YE
i think he has normal n otebook
or he let us see his retro laptop
https://connectall.org/dell-studio-1735-core-2-duo-t8100-at-2-10ghz-4gb-ram-250gb-hdd.html
This does reach the minimum specs. But I've played KSP at similar specs and it's not great. I'd recommend 4+ cores and 8gb minimum. Then with graphics, 1+gb that's somewhat modern

ATI Radeon HD 5970 725 Mhz 2GB GDDR5
AMD A12-8870E
With this one, if the specs are correct, a gpu upgrade would be necessary, the radeon card is worse in benchmarks than my current gpu (which is shit).