Dude, you're not serious.
As Noor Nehan says, it's slightly too heavy. But if it was only that, this could be easily fixed, by using a slightly smaller fuel tank, or by adjusting the fuel quantity of one of the tanks.
But there's more to come.
First, this. I assume this is actually not the case, because I recreated the rocket, and with a second engine clipped, it's 6 tons heavier. But that's still fine.
But the most important is this:
View attachment 75919
From this screenshot, you're at 28.5 km, 371 m/s, and you have 94% of remaining fuel.
First it means that you used a very inefficient ascent profile. And from that point you'll need at least 1300 m/s to reach orbital velocity (not even taking into account gravity drag and the energy loss due to altitude variation).
I can simulate this with my ship design assistant. Those are your second stage's characteristics (when full):
View attachment 75920
This is the result after a 1300 m/s burn:
View attachment 75921
It means you can't have more than 39% remaining fuel when you reach orbit. Which by the way corresponds to 1470 m/s of remaining delta-V, far below the needed 1856 m/s, so the challenge is already failed from there.
Now look at what you show us when you reach orbit:
View attachment 75922
Yet another blatant cheat attempt. I warned you, don't try to fool us, if we can't trust you we just won't award you the badge. You didn't even follow the advice I gave, I'm trying to help you you know.
I posted my own Voyager entry, with a video. I suggest that you have a look at it to improve your flight technique.