Nice design, but with no docking port and no engine that satellite won't do anything now
In practice, all satellites have a propulsion system to make trajectories correction and to deorbit themselves when they end their life.
Nice design, but with no docking port and no engine that satellite won't do anything now
In practice, all satellites have a propulsion system to make trajectories correction and to deorbit themselves when they end their life.
Yes, all satellites. Satellites need to remain oriented at all times, or to maintain an specific orbit. Maybe both. That's why all of them have a propulsion system.
Yes really, ALL satellites. It's a legal requirement of the FCC and the US Government. Satellites either need a method to de-orbit themselves or move to a graveyard orbit before they die so they don't become dangerous dead weight in orbit. Otherwise you get this thing called Kessler Syndrome, which you may of heard of.
Ok, not Sputnik
But seriously yes, that's true of all recent satellites (and even not so recent ones). Blazer and Horus Lupercal already explained why very well, I can't say better.
Yes really, ALL satellites. It's a legal requirement of the FCC and the US Government. Satellites either need a method to de-orbit themselves or move to a graveyard orbit before they die so they don't become dangerous dead weight in orbit. Otherwise you get this thing called Kessler Syndrome, which you may of heard of.
But as you say, they're usually in such low orbits that they tend not to need de-orbiting intentionally, as they'll come down pretty quickly themselves.
However as the article says, some end up a lot higher and can be up there for more than 25 years and as such there are ways being looked at for lightweight, non-powered de-orbiting methods.