Saturn 5 my cut

[Alecs]

This is not an accurate version of Saturn 5 no escape tower either

 

[Mars Pathfinder]

This is not an accurate version of Saturn 5 no escape tower either View attachment 44401 View attachment 44402 View attachment 44403 View attachment 44404 View attachment 44405 View attachment 44406 View attachment 44408 View attachment 44409 View attachment 44411 View attachment 44412 View attachment 44415 View attachment 44417 View attachment 44418 View attachment 44419 View attachment 44420 View attachment 44421

Nice try to build Saturn V!!

remodel your CSM and add 2 rcs for docking with LM and change your SPS in CSM replace it too huge.....

 

[TtTOtW]

Nice try to build Saturn V!!

remodel your CSM and add 2 rcs for docking with LM and change your SPS in CSM replace it too huge.....

Yeah but that TWR is deceptive. Can't blame the man for believing the numbers on screen, but think about it. 5x400t = 2000t thrust. Divide that by 1160t and the TWR approaches 1.9. Ok so that's not a train smash. My point is, Alecs, nice rocket. I mean really nice. I like the CSM's unique design and also the lander. But, double check your TWR manually when overlapping engines. In a different scenario it might actually destroy your mission, depending on a bunch of other factors.

 

[BANDWITH]

This is not an accurate version of Saturn 5 no escape tower either View attachment 44401 View attachment 44402 View attachment 44403 View attachment 44404 View attachment 44405 View attachment 44406 View attachment 44408 View attachment 44409 View attachment 44411 View attachment 44412 View attachment 44415 View attachment 44417 View attachment 44418 View attachment 44419 View attachment 44420 View attachment 44421

Holy impatient moon landing moly

 

[TtTOtW]

Holy impatient moon landing moly

Yeah the lander and CSM setup spells "FEAR OF CRASH AND TERRIBLY IMPATIENT" in bold capital letters. Didn't see that Titan until you pointed it out, lol.

 

[Mars Pathfinder]

Holy impatient moon landing moly

Hans get the Toaster!!!

 

[Alecs]

Yeah but that TWR is deceptive. Can't blame the man for believing the numbers on screen, but think about it. 5x400t = 2000t thrust. Divide that by 1160t and the TWR approaches 1.9. Ok so that's not a train smash. My point is, Alecs, nice rocket. I mean really nice. I like the CSM's unique design and also the lander. But, double check your TWR manually when overlapping engines. In a different scenario it might actually destroy your mission, depending on a bunch of other factors.

Thank you I'll consider these tips for futuristic rockets!

 

[Marmilo]

This is not an accurate version of Saturn 5 no escape tower either View attachment 44401 View attachment 44402 View attachment 44403 View attachment 44404 View attachment 44405 View attachment 44406 View attachment 44408 View attachment 44409 View attachment 44411 View attachment 44412 View attachment 44415 View attachment 44417 View attachment 44418 View attachment 44419 View attachment 44420 View attachment 44421

That CSM is a spine-crushing machine.

 

[Blazer Ayanami]

Thank you I'll consider these tips for futuristic rockets!

Those tips can be applied to any rocket.