AstronautAdam thank you for the ping, I missed Yonkee's ping. Apologies for the delay.
That said, unfortunately as I was taking a final look just now, I discovered a small accident. I've recreated it below for clarity:
This is how your payload originally looked when it was 701t:
View attachment 95509
But then when you redid your submission, the adaptation changed and it became 697t:
View attachment 95510
If this analysis is in error, don't hesitate to correct me.
As it is, the submission fails because of an honest mistake. I've no doubt it will pass when you redo it.