Next up is the EM-1B. Most of the rocket us unchanged other than the second stage. The second stage now has landing legs and parachutes. I tested a propulsive landing, but the stage flipped. That's why I settled for parachutes.
Here is the EM-1C. It is designed to enable first stage reusability, even with a heavy payload. It does this by replacing the large second stage with a lighter, disposable one. This enables the rocket to reuse the first stage with heavier payloads.
And that brings us to the EM-2A. Featuring reusable first and second stages. Both are pretty easy to land too! I still need a way to reuse the fairings and separators though.
After some modifications to the fairings and second stage, I got it to be fully reusable. I removed the separator mechanism. I replaced it with a docking port attached to a fairing. The fairings can now attach to the side of the second stage and land with it.
After some modifications to the fairings and second stage, I got it to be fully reusable. I removed the separator mechanism. I replaced it with a docking port attached to a fairing. The fairings can now attach to the side of the second stage and land with it. View attachment 39966
Ok... you can fuck off. I'm just saying it was similar never said he copied never said it was bad I think it's interesting. So you can screw off. So in fact your the one who pissed me off.
Ok... you can fuck off. I'm just saying it was similar never said he copied never said it was bad I think it's interesting. So you can screw off. So in fact your the one who pissed me off.
Edit: All the drama you've caused on the HPR Boardroom, on this thread... I have nothing to do with any of both, until now that I make a single comment... A single comment... And you react like that?!?! All your anger is diverted to me?!?! That only makes me laugh even more!
Ok... you can fuck off. I'm just saying it was similar never said he copied never said it was bad I think it's interesting. So you can screw off. So in fact your the one who pissed me off.