I think this gets a score of three, for doing the bare minimum.
There's a lot you can do with oberth effect, aerobraking, gravity assists and thoughtful piloting in this mission to make it efficient, but you didn't really do any of that.
The things that stand out negatively were your launch trajectory, doing things in an unoptimal order, doing burns unnecessarily far from a heavy body and lack of aerobraking.
For the launch trajectory, you made your gravity turn rather late and high. There's so much fuel you could save by turning like your life depends on it, and not worrying about reaching 100°C. Typically the angle-o-meter Stef was generous enough to give is a bit conservative for many rockets, so don't be afraid to push it.
For the second thing, for example you wasted fuel on doing burns to reach mars after the moon and asteroid. You could have, for example, made mars your first destination, and timed your transfer so that the moon would be in the way whilst you went to Mars. So that you could accomplish the moon flyby for nearly free.
You could have left the asteroid for later in this scenario, maybe swinging past it at the end before you re-entered.
For the third and fourth things, you always want to take advantage of what nature gives you for free. The closer to the surface of a body you do your burn, the more dV you get from the burn, free boost from gravity.
And always take advantage of aerobraking if possible. Why did you enter orbit around the earth at the end rather than just diving into its atmosphere?
As an extremely rough guideline (I didn't check to be sure), if you could do this without the stage that has the two kolibris, it would be notably more efficient.