Search results

bp edit can do this without dlc, but it would be a lot of work.

bp edit can do this without dlc, but it would be a lot of work.

Round the health shield, place the parachute further in and add RCS.

yes, but i thought about that part too, the module will be useless after it is attached to the other module, so it will be discarded and that's it.

LK lunar module. I'm open to ideas about the landing leg.

Thank you Yes

Here is my N1, it can reach the Farlands (out of the solar system) but it is incomplete, it is also very slow, reducing drag. I haven't implemented the modules yet, if anyone can send a map inside the fairing, I would be grateful. (It's in real scale). The size occupies 150% of the construction...

you can go to the celestial body file and scroll down, then you will find an orbital category: parental = which body orbits. semiorbitalaxis (I think it is) = distance from the orbiting body.

Scape system completed:

Very nice.

Scape tower: :

then let it go ,-,

Very noice

Place VY Canis Majoris to orbit a dust.

I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think?

but doesn't stretching add weight?

it's normal, just edit the orbit values of the planets: Moon>Vênus, Mercury, Mars, Júpiter, etc.

if it were the normal probe it wouldn't fit or take off.

but I decreased the size of the probe and did over position

What are 25%? But what if I don't stretch, and instead put 3 ion engines?

I don't know why people buy IOS, they are extremely expensive, with low accessibility and personalization, and are worse in terms of performance, Apple should have gone bankrupt a long time ago.

It is a pity that bp edit is considered to be "cheating" among forum members...

(BP EDITED ALERT):

Generally, I don't really like to build completely vanillas, but this guy impressed me.

it should have less efficiency, but no drag.