but doesn't stretching add weight? No. See why we consider it's cheating? :)
Altaïr Space Stig, Master of gravity Staff member Head Moderator Team Kolibri Modder TEAM HAWK Atlas Deja Vu Under Pressure Forum Legend Aug 14, 2020 #51 Aug 14, 2020 #51 Usuário 321 said: but doesn't stretching add weight? Click to expand... No. See why we consider it's cheating?
Usuário 321 said: but doesn't stretching add weight? Click to expand... No. See why we consider it's cheating?
Blazer Ayanami Space Shuttle enthusiast // Retired Admin Registered Forum Legend Aug 14, 2020 #52 Aug 14, 2020 #52 Usuário 321 said: What are 25%? Click to expand... Apple's devices have better performance. MUCH better. Usuário 321 said: but doesn't stretching add weight? Click to expand... No. If you stretch an engine you'll have the double TWR and fuel consuption, for the mass of only one engine. That's why Its cheating.
Usuário 321 said: What are 25%? Click to expand... Apple's devices have better performance. MUCH better. Usuário 321 said: but doesn't stretching add weight? Click to expand... No. If you stretch an engine you'll have the double TWR and fuel consuption, for the mass of only one engine. That's why Its cheating.
Usuário 321 Registered Aug 15, 2020 #53 Aug 15, 2020 #53 Blazer said: Apple's devices have better performance. MUCH better. No. If you stretch an engine you'll have the double TWR and fuel consuption, for the mass of only one engine. That's why Its cheating. Click to expand... I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think? Attachments Screenshot_20200814-195130_Spaceflight Simulator.jpg 135.5 KB Views: 90 Screenshot_20200814-195246_Spaceflight Simulator.jpg 114.4 KB Views: 94 Screenshot_20200814-195403_Spaceflight Simulator.jpg 270.9 KB Views: 98 Screenshot_20200814-195437_Spaceflight Simulator.jpg 213.5 KB Views: 93 Screenshot_20200814-195506_Spaceflight Simulator.jpg 342.2 KB Views: 91
Blazer said: Apple's devices have better performance. MUCH better. No. If you stretch an engine you'll have the double TWR and fuel consuption, for the mass of only one engine. That's why Its cheating. Click to expand... I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think?
T TtTOtW Guest Aug 15, 2020 #54 Aug 15, 2020 #54 Usuário 321 said: I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think? Click to expand... As long as that probe is normal size, legit record IMO
Usuário 321 said: I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think? Click to expand... As long as that probe is normal size, legit record IMO
Usuário 321 Registered Aug 15, 2020 #55 Aug 15, 2020 #55 TtTOtW said: As long as that probe is normal size, legit record IMO Click to expand... then let it go ,-,
TtTOtW said: As long as that probe is normal size, legit record IMO Click to expand... then let it go ,-,
Blazer Ayanami Space Shuttle enthusiast // Retired Admin Registered Forum Legend Aug 15, 2020 #56 Aug 15, 2020 #56 Usuário 321 said: I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think? Click to expand... If your probe's not bp edited is fine
Usuário 321 said: I managed to get to and from the moon without the engines stretched, that is, 4.26 tons, what do you think? Click to expand... If your probe's not bp edited is fine
