Sure. I'll show you the screenshots I have right now, but tell me if you want me to detail a step in particular.
After the Moon transfer, I was left with 70% of fuel, and 2942.7 m/s of ΔV:
View attachment 122453
This is when I'm about to encounter Venus: 69.8% of fuel, 2936.3 m/s of ΔV:
View attachment 122454
I didn't realize myself I used that little fuel... I used the approach lines to plan my encounters largely in advance. It occured that I could anticipate an encounter 15 orbits before it happens, and the correction is very very cheap in this case. Especially that I usually use every fly-by opportunity to adjust my trajectory for the next encounter, like here:
View attachment 122458
Upon the first encounter with Mercury, my fuel has barely dropped:
View attachment 122455
This is because I usually perform 2 Venus assists. The first one sends me on a resonant orbit of ratio 4:3 (my ship orbits four times when Venus orbits three times), then the second one sends me towards Mercury perihelion.
For the V-leveraging steps I don't have all of them, but I have this one:
View attachment 122456
60.3% of fuel and 2684.4 m/s remaining at that stage.
Finally, Mercury orbit:
View attachment 122457
51.9% of fuel, 2444.7 m/s remaining.
I noticed that the remaining fuel there could depend a lot on your ability to aim for an insertion when Mercury is at the perihelion, which is explained by a bigger Oberth effect from the Sun. A first attempt left me with 29% of fuel after landing, because I was less efficient on this point.
Finally, a good landing technique, when you comes to a stop right above the ground so that the powered descent is minimal can make you gain a few tenths of percent point:
View attachment 122459
This is the corresponding screenshot:
View attachment 122460
The landing consumed 667.4 m/s of ΔV overall.